|
The Board presents its report on directors’ remuneration and related matters. The report has the following sections:
- Remuneration Committee
- Remuneration policy
- Performance graph
- Directors’ emoluments
- Share options
- Performance Share Plan
- Annual bonus
- Retirement benefits
- Directors’ service contracts
- Combined Code
- Shareholding guideline
- Directors’ interests
1. Remuneration Committee
Both the level and structure of executive directors’ pay are decided by the Remuneration Committee. The remuneration of non-executive
directors and the Chairman is a matter reserved for the Board as a whole. No director is involved in any discussions as to his or her own remuneration.
The Remuneration Committee is a Board committee consisting exclusively of independent non-executive directors: Lady Patten (Chairman), Sir Alan Rudge, Oliver Stocken, Frank Newman (who joined the Committee on 17 September 2003) and Andy Hornby (who joined the
Committee on 21 January 2004).
It has written terms of reference which are available on request and which are published on the GUS plc website.
- Determine and agree with the Board the policy for the remuneration of the Group Chief Executive, the Chairman of the Board, the executive directors and the Company Secretary, and such other senior executives as are designated appropriate to include. At the present time, the designated list is made up of selected senior executives who report to GUS executive directors.
- In determining remuneration policy, the Committee takes into account all factors which it deems necessary. The objective of such policy is to ensure that members of executive management are provided with appropriate incentives to encourage enhanced performance and are rewarded for their individual contributions to the success of the Company in a fair and responsible manner.
- Approve the design of, and determine targets for, any performance-related pay schemes operated by the Company and approve the total annual payments made under such schemes.
- Within the terms of the agreed policy and, as indicated below, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board and/or Chief Executive as appropriate, monitor and approve the total remuneration package of each executive director, and the remuneration of other designated senior executives including bonuses, incentive payments and share options or other share awards.
In making its decisions, the Committee takes advice from the Chairman, the Group Chief Executive and the Group Director of Human
Resources who are invited to attend meetings of the Committee as and when appropriate. In addition, the Committee has direct access to
the relevant external advisers appointed by the Remuneration Committee and the Company. For the year ended 31 March 2004 the
principal remuneration advisers were Kepler Associates. Other than remuneration advice, no other services were provided by Kepler
Associates. In addition Towers Perrin provided salary survey data and administrative support on various share schemes.
The Committee meets at least three times a year and holds additional meetings where necessary. The Committee met on seven occasions
during the year under review. Lady Patten and Oliver Stocken attended all seven meetings and Sir Alan Rudge was present on five occasions. Frank Newman attended all four meetings that took place following his appointment as a member of the Committee. Andy
Hornby attended one of the three meetings that took place following his appointment to the Board on 21 January 2004.
2. Remuneration policy
GUS has three main businesses that continue to achieve sustained profitable growth. Key to this success has been a move to a
performance-oriented culture with a clear link between remuneration and performance.
The four tenets on which our remuneration structure is founded are as follows:
Base pay levels are established on a market competitive basis but no higher than this.
Benefits (for example pensions and cars) are provided on a basis that is appropriate to the local market in which the director is employed.
Performance related incentives provide the opportunity to deliver substantial rewards for high performance.
Wherever reasonable, pay is aligned to shareholders’ interests. This is reflected in the choice of performance standards applied to
incentive awards and the fact that, for a large part of the overall incentive package, rewards are denominated in GUS shares.
Consistent with our philosophy, salaries are set on the basis of mid-market practice amongst UK companies of comparable size.
Performance related incentives are targeted at upper quartile levels for outstanding performance to produce a highly leveraged package if
our growth objectives are attained.
Performance linkages
Each element in the reward package is designed to support the achievement of different corporate objectives. These are illustrated below:
| Element |
Purpose |
Performance standard |
| (a) Base salary |
Reflects the competitive salary level for the particular job and takes account of personal contribution and performance. |
Individual contribution |
| (b) Annual bonus |
Rewards the delivery of current operational targets. Provides leveraged opportunity to reward the achievement of current performance targets through re-investment of the bonus in GUS shares with matching opportunities. Aligns with shareholder interests through delivery in shares. |
Profit before tax together with efficient capital usage |
| (c) Share options |
Direct link to growth objectives through EPS growth hurdle and to value creation through share price increase. Aligns with shareholder interests. |
EPS growth |
(d) Performance Share Plan |
Aligns with shareholder interests through delivery of shares. Rewards out-performance in comparison with peers. |
Relative total shareholder return |
In fair value terms, the proportion of total pay (excluding pensions and benefits) which is variable is approximately 60 per cent.
The pay elements are further explained below.
(a) Base salary
To ascertain the job’s market value, external remuneration consultants annually review and provide data about market salary levels, and
advise the Remuneration Committee accordingly. These market rates are based on peer group data and derived from the pay position
described above. Before making a final decision on individual salary awards, the Committee assesses each director’s contribution to the
business, to reflect individual performance.
(b) Annual bonus
To reward annual performance, executive directors are eligible for an annual incentive with a target of 50 per cent of base salary and a
maximum of 100 per cent of salary for substantially exceeding targets.
Directors are given the opportunity to defer receipt of their bonus and invest it in GUS shares. The number of shares acquired on behalf of
the executive is matched on a sliding scale depending on the achievement against target for the relevant financial year. The number of
matching shares may vary from a threshold ratio of one half for one, to a maximum of two for one. The release of these shares is deferred
for three years including the deferred bonus.
During the year, the Remuneration Committee decided to introduce dividend accrual on co-investment matching shares to strengthen
alignment with shareholders. Consequently, for matching shares awarded after 31 March 2004 and in subsequent years, dividends will
accrue. If an executive resigns during the three-year period they will forfeit the right to the matching shares and associated dividends.
Bonuses are currently awarded for achieving profit before tax growth and meeting efficient capital usage targets. We believe that linking
incentives to profit growth helps to reinforce our growth objectives and is an appropriate measure for a predominantly retail business.
Targets are calibrated using a range of benchmarks based on internal and external expectations.
(c) Share options
For all grants up to and including the December 2003 grant the performance test requires Earnings Per Share ‘EPS’ growth to exceed the
growth in inflation +4 per cent per annum over a continuous three year period. This performance test may be repeated twice.
During the year, the Remuneration Committee reviewed the performance condition and decided to eliminate retesting. Consequently for
options granted after December 2003 there will be no retesting of the EPS performance condition.
The link to share price provides a built-in performance driver for option holders and further aligns them with shareholders’ interests.
Options vest three years after grant, are subject to the performance test and remain exercisable for seven years after vesting. No director
may normally receive annually an option grant with a face value of more than one times salary. In exceptional circumstances the
Remuneration Committee has discretion to grant up to two times salary.
(d) Performance Share Plan
The primary objective of the Performance Share Plan is to underpin the longer-term incentive structure by providing a share-based reward
which is earned only when the Company out-performs its peers.
GUS’ performance under this plan is assessed in terms of three-year total shareholder return in relation to the following group of peer
companies: Acxiom, Boots, Dixons, Equifax, Harte Hanks, Kingfisher, Marks & Spencer, N. Brown, Next, Pinault Printemps Redoute, Reed
Elsevier, Reuters, Signet and Tesco.
None of the awards will vest if GUS’ total shareholder return (defined as share price movement plus reinvested dividends) is below the
median return for the comparator group.
Once GUS achieves median performance, 40 per cent of the award may vest, while 100 per cent of the award may be earned for an upper
quartile return or better. Between median and upper quartile performance, awards may vest based on straight-line interpolation. No
awards will be released unless the Remuneration Committee is also satisfied with the Company’s underlying financial performance over the
relevant period.
For the year ended 31 March 2004, the maximum grant available to directors was 100 per cent of salary, converted to shares at the price
prevailing at the time the awards were made. The awards were made in June 2003 and will vest, to the extent that the performance test is
met, in June 2006.
During the year, the Remuneration Committee decided to introduce dividend accrual on performance shares to strengthen alignment with
shareholders. Consequently, performance shares awarded after 31 March 2004 and in subsequent years will accrue dividends.
(e) Pensions and other benefits
Pensions are offered in line with local competitive practice. The retirement age for directors in the UK is 60 under arrangements which
broadly provide a pension of two thirds of final salary (subject to Inland Revenue limits), life assurance at four times salary and ill health
and dependants’ pensions. Incentive payments (such as annual bonuses) are not pensionable.
Arrangements are in place to provide pension benefits to those executive directors affected by the pensions cap. These are designed to
provide pension benefits in excess of the Inland Revenue cap thereby placing those directors in broadly the same position as directors
whose pension is unaffected by this cap. Further details are provided under the disclosure of the arrangements for each director.
Cars are provided on a basis that is consistent with competitive practice.
Executive Directors in the UK, in common with all GUS’ UK employees, are eligible to participate in the Company’s Savings Related Share
Option Scheme.
(f) Service contracts
All executive directors have rolling service contracts which can be terminated by the Company giving twelve months’ notice. In the event
of termination of the director’s contract, any compensation payment is calculated in accordance with normal legal principles, including the
application of mitigation to the extent appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
3. Performance graph
The adjacent performance graph shows the total
shareholder return (‘TSR’) for GUS versus the
FTSE 100 for the last five financial years
4. Directors’ emoluments
 | 2004
£'000 | 2003
£’000 |
|---|
| Total emoluments : | | |
|---|
| salary | 2,258 | 1,781 |
|---|
| performance related bonuses | 2,258 | 1,628 |
|---|
| taxable benefits in kind | 141 | 107 |
|---|
| non-executive directors | 620 |
548 |
|---|
| | 5,277 | 4,064 |
|---|
| Payments to former directors (Note 1) | 14 | 41 |
|---|
| Pension contributions | 329 | 289 |
|---|
| Pensions in respect of former directors | 440 |
398 |
|---|
 | 6,060 |
4,792 |
|---|
Note
- Eric Barnes retired from the Board on 25 July 2001. He received fees of £14,000 under a consultancy agreement which ended in September 2003.
The following table shows an analysis of the emoluments of the individual directors.
|
Salary £’000 | Annual
bonus £’000 | Taxable
benefits £’000 | Total
2004
£’000 | Total
2003 £’000 |
|---|
| Executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
| Terry Duddy |
630 |
630 |
25 |
1,285 |
1,074 |
|---|
| John Peace (Note 1) |
700 |
700 |
32 |
1,432 |
1,331 |
|---|
| Alan Smart |
119 |
119 |
12 |
250 |
156 |
|---|
| Craig Smith (Note 2) |
389 |
389 |
25 |
803 |
20 |
|---|
| David Tyler (Note 1) |
420 |
420 |
18 |
858 |
778 |
|---|
| Non-executive directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
| Sir Victor Blank |
328 |
– |
29 |
357 |
324 |
|---|
| Lord Harris of Peckham |
48 |
– |
– |
48 |
42 |
|---|
| Andy Hornby (Note 3) |
6 |
– |
– |
6 |
– |
|---|
| Frank Newman |
48 |
– |
– |
48 |
42 |
|---|
| Lady Patten of Wincanton |
67 |
– |
– |
67 |
57 |
|---|
| Sir Alan Rudge |
56 |
– |
– |
56 |
54 |
|---|
| Oliver Stocken |
67 |
– |
– |
67 |
57 |
|---|
| Former directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
| Victor Barnett (Note 4) |
– |
– |
– |
– |
129 |
|---|
Benefits for executive directors include a fully expensed company car or cash equivalent and private medical insurance. The Chairman and
non-executive directors received no taxable benefits other than the Chairman having the use of a company car, the taxable benefit for which
in the year under review was £29,000.
The remuneration structure for the Chairman and non-executive directors remains unchanged from last year. Non-executive directors receive a
base cash fee of £30,000 per annum with an additional cash fee of £7,500 per annum payable to the chairmen of the Audit and
Remuneration Committees and the senior independent director. In addition they each receive 2,500 GUS shares per annum and the chairmen
of the Audit and Remuneration Committees receive an additional 1,500 shares per annum. Sir Victor Blank’s remuneration of £328,000 per
annum, reported above, consists of £30,000 as a non-executive director and £298,000 as Chairman (cash fee of £217,000 and 15,000
shares). The 15,000 shares were purchased for Sir Victor Blank on 24 July 2003. The value of the shares so purchased, £111,000, is included
within the remuneration reported in the above table. The shares so acquired are to be retained by Sir Victor Blank until his retirement from
the Board.
The following shares were purchased for the non-executive directors on 24 July 2003. The value reported below is included within the
remuneration reported in the above table:
| Number of
shares | Value
£ |
|---|
| Lord Harris of Peckham |
2,500 |
18,263 |
|---|
| Frank Newman |
2,500 |
18,263 |
|---|
| Lady Patten of Wincanton |
4,000 |
29,221 |
|---|
| Sir Alan Rudge |
2,500 |
18,263 |
|---|
| Oliver Stocken |
4,000 |
29,221 |
|---|
Non-executive directors are obliged to retain shares awarded under these arrangements until their retirement from the Board. Any tax
liability connected to these arrangements is the responsibility of the individual director.
Notes
- John Peace serves as non-executive Chairman and David Tyler as a non-executive director on the Board of Burberry Group plc, a listed
company in which GUS retains approximately 66 per cent of the issued share capital. Neither executive receives any additional
remuneration for such services.
- Craig Smith was appointed to the Board on 25 March 2003.
- Andy Hornby was appointed to the Board on 21 January 2004.
- Victor Barnett retired from the Board on 1 July 2002.
5. Share options
Details of options granted to executive directors, under the Company’s executive share option schemes, are set out in the table below:
| Number of options at 1 April 2003 or date of appointment | Options granted during the year | Options exercised during the year | Exercise price | Share price on date of exercise | Date from which exercisable | Expiry Date | Total number of options at 31 March 2004 |
|---|
| Terry Duddy | | | | | | | | |
|---|
| 07.04.00 | 93,159 |
– |
93,159 |
375.7p |
642.8p |
07.04.03 |
06.04.10 |
|
|---|
| 07.08.00 | 81,737 |
– |
81,737 |
428.2p |
747.8p |
07.08.03 |
06.08.10 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 150,155 |
– |
– |
612.7p |
– |
11.06.04 |
10.06.11 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 80,398 |
– |
– |
653.0p |
– |
06.06.05 |
05.06.12 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – |
85,862 |
– |
675.5p |
– |
19.06.06 |
18.06.13 |
|
|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
316,415 |
|---|
| John Peace | | | | | | | | |
|---|
| 07.04.00 | 146,393 |
– |
146,393 |
375.7p |
637.5p |
07.04.03 |
06.04.10 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 195,854 |
– |
– |
612.7p |
– |
11.06.04 |
10.06.11 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 99,540 |
– |
– |
653.0p |
– |
06.06.05 |
05.06.12 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – |
103,626 |
– |
675.5p |
– |
19.06.06 |
18.06.13 |
|
|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
399,020 |
|---|
| Alan Smart | | | | | | | | |
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 37,038 |
– |
– |
612.7p |
– |
11.06.04 |
10.06.11 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 14,235 |
– |
– |
653.0p |
– |
06.06.05 |
05.06.12 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – |
16,107 |
– |
675.5p |
– |
19.06.06 |
18.06.13 |
|
|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
67,380 |
|---|
Craig Smith (see below) | | | | | | | | |
|---|
| 14.06.00 | 191,051 |
– |
191,051 |
381.3p |
669.1p |
14.06.01 |
13.06.06 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 214,048 |
– |
– |
612.7p |
– |
11.06.02 |
10.06.07 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 |
198,337 |
– |
– |
653.0p |
– |
06.06.03 |
05.06.08 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – |
58,210 |
– |
675.5p |
– |
19.06.06 |
18.06.13 |
|
|---|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
470,595 |
|---|
| David Tyler |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|---|
| 09.12.98 | 43,088 |
– |
5,170 |
580.2p |
678.1p |
09.12.01 |
08.12.08 |
|
|---|
| 23.06.99 | 37,308 |
– |
– |
690.2p |
– |
23.06.02 |
22.06.09 |
|
|---|
| 07.04.00 | 86,505 |
– |
86,505 |
375.7p |
678.1p |
07.04.03 |
06.04.10 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 114,248 |
– |
– |
612.7p |
– |
11.06.04 |
10.06.11 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 58,192 |
– |
– |
653.0p |
– |
06.06.05 |
05.06.12 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – |
62,176 |
– |
675.5p |
– |
19.06.06 |
18.06.13 |
|
|---|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
309,842 |
|---|
Options granted to Craig Smith prior to his date of appointment were granted under the North America Stock Option Plan. The 2003 grant
was made, and any subsequent grants to Mr Smith will be made, under the UK Executive Share Option Scheme.
The exercise prices represent the average of the middle market quotations of a GUS share as derived from the Daily Official List of
The London Stock Exchange for the three immediately preceding dealing days to the date on which options were granted.
The market price of the shares at the end of the financial year was 749p; the highest and lowest prices during the financial year were 791p
and 490p respectively.
The remuneration of non-executive directors does not include share options.
Full details of directors’ shareholdings and options to subscribe are contained in the Company’s Register of Directors’ Interests.
Phantom share option
As previously reported, 83,596 Burberry shares are being held by the Company in the name of Victor Barnett. The Company has agreed to
match the number of Burberry shares in the ratio 1.3 to 1 with the receipt of the total number of shares deferred for a period of five years
from the date of the Burberry IPO. Mr Barnett can, however, elect to receive 90 per cent of the shares sooner, in which case he would forfeit
the remaining 10 per cent of the shares.
In addition, Victor Barnett was awarded 167,836 Burberry shares on 1 September 2003 in respect of his annual incentive for 2001/2 under
an agreement made with the Company when he retired from the Board. The Agreement allowed for the annual incentive payment to be
deferred, with delivery in cash or shares being dependent on the date of the IPO.
Options granted to directors under the Company’s SAYE share option scheme were as follows:
|
Number of
options at
31 March 2003
and 2004 |
Exercise
price |
Date from
which
exercisable |
Expiry
date |
| Sir Victor Blank |
4,394 |
384p |
01.05.06 |
31.10.06 |
| Terry Duddy |
4,394 |
384p |
01.05.06 |
31.10.06 |
| Lord Harris of Peckham |
2,522 |
384p |
01.05.04 |
31.10.04 |
| Lady Patten of Wincanton |
2,522 |
384p |
01.05.04 |
31.10.04 |
| John Peace |
4,394 |
384p |
01.05.06 |
31.10.06 |
| Oliver Stocken |
4,394 |
384p |
01.05.06 |
31.10.06 |
| David Tyler |
4,394 |
384p |
01.05.06 |
31.10.06 |
As previously reported, the non-executive directors received, in 2001, invitations to participate in the Company’s SAYE share option scheme.
This was a ‘one-off’ arrangement.
6. Performance Share Plan
An award under the Company’s Performance Share Plan takes the form of a deferred right to acquire shares at no cost to the participant. The vesting of
these awards is subject to the performance conditions described above.
Awards to present directors under the plan, described above, have been as follows:
| Plan shares awarded at 31 March 2003 | Plan shares awarded during the year to 31 March 2004 | Plan shares released during the year to 31 March 2004 | Share price on date of award | Share price on date of release |
Vesting date | Total plan shares held at 31 March 2004 |
|---|
| Terry Duddy | | | | | |  |
|
|---|
| 07.04.00 | 74,527 | – | 74,527 | 375.7p | 632.356p | April 03 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 37,538 | – | – | 612.7p | – | June 04 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 80,398 | – | – | 653.0p | – | June 05 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – | 85,862 | – | 675.5p | – | June 06 |
|
|---|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
203,798 |
|---|
| John Peace | | | | | |  |
|
|---|
| 07.04.00 | 146,393 | – | 146,393 | 375.7p | 632.356p | April 03 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 48,963 | – | – | 612.7p | – | June 04 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 99,540 | – | – | 653.0p | – | June 05 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – | 103,626 | – | 675.5p | – | June 06 |
|
|---|
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
252,129 |
|---|
| Alan Smart |  | | | | |  |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 14,235 | – | – | 653.0p | – | June 05 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – | 16,107 |
– |
675.5p |
– |
June 06 |
|
|---|
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
30,342 |
|---|
| David Tyler | | | | | |  |
|
|---|
| 07.04.00 | 69,204 | – | 69,204 | 375.7p | 632.356p | April 03 |
|
|---|
| 11.06.01 | 28,562 | – | – | 612.7p | – | June 04 |
|
|---|
| 06.06.02 | 58,192 | – | – | 653.0p | – | June 05 |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – | 62,176 | – | 675.5p | – | June 06 |
|
|---|
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
148,930 |
|---|
| Craig Smith | | | | | |  |
|
|---|
| 19.06.03 | – | 58,210 | – | 675.5p | – | June 06 |
|
|---|
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
58,210 |
|---|
7. Annual bonus
As explained in note (b) directors are given the opportunity to defer receipt of their annual bonus and have it invested in GUS
shares (‘Invested Shares’). Last year, John Peace, Terry Duddy and David Tyler chose to invest the whole of their ‘net’ bonus and Craig Smith
50% of his bonus. Shares so purchased on their behalf, applying the bonuses reported in last year’s Annual Report, are included in the table
of directors’ interests. Matching shares under these arrangements are not released until the expiry of a three-year
period and the right to these shares is forfeited if a director resigns before then.
Conditional rights in such matching shares to present directors under this plan are as follows:
 | Conditional rights to matching shares at
1 April 2003 |
Conditional rights granted during the year to
31 March 2004 |
Conditional rights to matching shares at
31 March 2004 |
|---|
| Terry Duddy | 144,056 |
158,193 |
302,249 |
|---|
| John Peace | 187,900 |
195,858 |
383,758 |
|---|
| David Tyler | 109,608 |
114,501 |
224,109 |
|---|
| Craig Smith | – |
65,100 |
65,100 |
|---|
|
In addition, the Remuneration Committee has agreed to grant in June 2004 an extra number of restricted shares to Terry Duddy to the value of £500,000 as a one-off award.
These shares are granted in recognition of his significant individual contribution made during the year ended 31 March 2004. The restricted shares under this arrangement will not be released until the expiry of a three-year period and are forfeitable if Terry Duddy were to resign within three years of the award.
8. Retirement benefits
Terry Duddy is a member of the Argos Pension Scheme which will provide him on retirement at age 60 with a pension of up to two thirds of the pension earnings cap subject to Inland Revenue limits. The figures shown below are based on his capped pensionable earnings. The application of Inland Revenue rules has resulted in a restatement of his accrued pension and transfer value at 31 March 2003. In addition, his contract provides for the choice of a funded or unfunded scheme to provide benefits in excess of the pension earnings cap. Mr Duddy has elected to have paid to him a cash sum for investment at his own discretion. The amount so paid in the year under review was £246,000.
John Peace is a member of the GUS Pension Scheme. His benefits are not restricted by the pension earnings cap, and therefore the following pension figures reflect his tax-approved Scheme benefits.
David Tyler is a member of the GUS Pension Scheme. His benefits within the Scheme are restricted by the pension earnings cap. However, his contract allows for an unfunded scheme to provide for benefits in excess of the cap (although part of this promise will be provided for by a funded arrangement, which was closed to future contributions on 1 April 2002). The pension figures overleaf reflect both his approved and unapproved entitlements.
Alan Smart is a member of the pension scheme operated by the Group’s South African subsidiary. The transfer value at March 2004, shown in the table overleaf, has been calculated using the actuarial basis applicable had he left service at this date. This basis reflects market conditions in South Africa at March 2004 and differs from the basis used at March 2003.
Craig Smith participates in Experian North America’s 401(k) pension plan, a defined contribution style arrangement. Company contributions to the plan in the year ended 31 March 2004 amounted to $8,200. In addition, instead of providing Mr Smith with a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the Company pays him an additional cash sum annually in advance for investment at his discretion. The additional cash sum for 2004/05 was paid in the year ended 31 March 2004 and amounted to $143,000.
The table set out below provides the disclosure of directors’ pension entitlements in respect of benefits from tax-exempt schemes and unfunded arrangements. | Accrued pension at 31 March 2004 per annum (1) £’000 | Accrued pension at 31 March 2003 per annum (2) £’000 | Transfer value at 31 March 2004 (3) £’000 | Transfer value at 31 March 2003 (4) £’000 | Change in transfer value (less Director’s contributions) (5) £’000 | Additional pension earned to 31 March 2004 (net of inflation) per annum (6) £’000 | Transfer value of the increase (less Director’s contributions) (7) £’000 |
|---|
| Terry Duddy | 9 | 7 |
86 |
50 | 21 | 2 | – | | John Peace | 374 | 362 | 5,156 | 4,161 | 995 | 2 | 28 |
|---|
| David Tyler | 91 | 77 | 1,015 | 637 | 363 | 12 | 119 |
|---|
 | Rand ‘000 | Rand ‘000 | Rand ‘000 | Rand ‘000 | Rand ‘000 | Rand ‘000 | Rand ‘000 |
|---|
| Alan Smart | 991 | 899 | 14,880 | 7,417 | 7,463 | 67 | 1,006 |
|---|
Notes
Columns (1) and (2) represent the deferred pension to which the directors would have been entitled had they left the Group at 31 March 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Column (3) is the transfer value of the deferred pension in column (1) calculated as at 31 March 2004 based on factors supplied by the actuary of the relevant group pension scheme in accordance with actuarial guidance note GN11.
Column (4) is the equivalent transfer value, but calculated as at 31 March 2003 on the assumption that the director left service at that date.
Column (5) is the change in the transfer value of accrued pension during the year net of contributions by the director.
Column (6) is the increase in pension built up during the year, recognising (i) the accrual rate for the additional service based on the pensionable salary in force at the year end, and (ii) where appropriate the effect of pay changes in ‘real’ (inflation adjusted) terms on the pension already earned at the start of the year.
Column (7) represents the transfer value of the deferred pension in column (6).
The disclosures in columns (1) to (5) are as required by the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations.
The disclosures in columns (6) and (7) are as required by the UK Listing Authority’s Listing Rules. The requirements of the Listing Rules differ from those of the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations. The Listing Rules require the additional pension earned over the year to be calculated as the difference between the pension accrued at the end of the financial year and the pension accrued at the start of the financial year less the increase in the pension earned over the year solely due to inflation. The change in transfer value required by the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations will also be significantly influenced by the assumptions underlying the calculation at the beginning and the end of the financial year and market conditions.
9. Directors’ service contracts
The disclosures required by the Regulations in respect of directors’ service contracts are as follows:
Terry Duddy
Terry Duddy has a service contract, dated 27 July 1999, which provides for twelve months’ notice on the part of the Company and six
months by the executive. The contract ends automatically when Mr Duddy reaches the normal retirement age of 60.
Under the terms of the contract, the Company reserves the option, in its absolute discretion, to terminate the executive’s employment by
paying in lieu of notice. The payment in lieu shall be calculated by reference to basic salary taking into account any pension contributions
and benefits in kind for the duration of the notice period but without taking into account any bonus or incentive payment of any kind.
John Peace
John Peace has a service contract, dated 31 March 2000, which provides for twelve months’ notice on the part of the Company and six
months by the executive. The contract ends automatically when Mr Peace reaches the normal retirement age of 60.
The Company may, in its absolute discretion, make a payment in lieu of the whole or part of the notice period of salary, benefits and any
bonus due for that period. The bonus will be calculated by reference to that paid in the previous financial year. The Company will use its
best endeavours to procure that the executive is treated under the terms of the LTIP and share option arrangements such that he is vested
to the maximum extent possible in LTIP and share options granted to him and that he is granted augmented benefits in the pension
scheme as if he had remained in service for the notice period.
If the Company terminates the executive’s employment contract in breach of its terms the Company will pay and the executive agrees to
accept as liquidated damages, in full and final settlement of all claims arising from such termination, a payment and arrangements in
respect of pension and share options computed as indicated above.
Alan Smart
Alan Smart has a service contract the commencement date for which is 1 April 1997 and which was varied on 21 August 2002 to provide
for notice periods of twelve months’ on the part of both the executive and the Company. Once notice of termination has been given the
Company shall continue to pay the executive’s salary and provide all the benefits provided for in the agreement.
David Tyler
David Tyler has a service contract, dated 3 February 1997, which provides for twelve months’ notice on the part of both the executive and
the Company. The contract will end automatically at normal retirement age of 60.
Under the terms of the contract, the Company reserves the option, in its absolute discretion, to terminate the executive’s employment by
making a payment in lieu of notice. The payment in lieu is calculated by reference to basic salary taking into account any pension
contributions and benefits in kind for the duration of the notice period but without taking into account any bonus or incentive payment of
any kind.
Craig Smith
Craig Smith has a service contract, dated 27 March 2003, which provides for twelve months’ notice on the part of the Company and six
months’ by the executive. The contract makes specific provisions for the amounts payable to the executive by the Company on
termination in specified circumstances in line with US practice for senior executives. Where termination is without cause the agreement
provides as follows:
- Monthly salary to be paid at the same times as the executive would have received such payment had he remained in employment for a
period of twelve months from the termination. Welfare benefits (or a payment in lieu) will continue during this period.
- Payment of the annual bonus to which the executive would have been entitled for the bonus period during which the termination
date occurred as if the level of achievement of target objectives were 100 per cent as of the end of such period, payable in equal
monthly instalments.
- The executive’s stock options under any stock option or similar plan will be exercisable as specified in the relevant plan rules and any
applicable grant agreement. Vesting of stock options will not be accelerated unless provided in the stock option or similar plan rules or
the applicable grant agreement.
Chairman and non-executive directors
The Chairman and the non-executive directors do not have service contracts and their appointment may be terminated at any time without
compensation. Non-executive directors are appointed for specific terms of three years and the appointment reviewed at the end of each
three-year term.
10. Combined Code
The constitution and operation of the Remuneration Committee are in compliance with the principles of good governance and Code of Best
Practice set out in the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority.
11. Shareholding guideline
It is one of the tenets of GUS’ reward strategy that shareholders’ and directors’ interests be aligned. To reinforce this, the Remuneration
Committee expects that, over a period of five years or so, executive directors will build a personal holding in GUS shares. This holding
should be 200,000 shares in the case of the Group Chief Executive and 120,000 shares in the case of other executive directors.
To underpin this commitment, the Committee expects that, while the guideline holding remains unfulfilled, executive directors will not
dispose of any shares vesting to them under any of the GUS incentive plans (save for any disposals necessary to meet tax liabilities arising
from them).
12. Directors’ interests
The beneficial interests of the directors, together with non-beneficial interests, in the Ordinary shares of the Company and in the ordinary
shares of Burberry Group plc, being a body corporate of the same group, are shown below in sections (i) and (ii). Share options granted to
directors, awards under the Performance Share Plan and the contingent interests in matching shares under the Co-investment Plan. Save for the disclosures in relation to Burberry shares, the directors have no interests in the debentures of the
Company or in any shares or debentures of the Company’s subsidiaries. | | GUS plc |
|
Burberry Group plc |
| 31 March 2004 | 31 March 2003 or on date of appointment | 31 March 2004 | 31 March 2003 |
|---|
| (i) Beneficial holdings | | | | |
|---|
| Sir Victor Blank | 210,000 | 195,000 | – | – |
|---|
| Terry Duddy | 107,383 | 60,717 | – | – |
|---|
| Lord Harris of Peckham | 12,200 | 9,700 | – | – |
|---|
| Andy Hornby | 2,920 | 2,920 | – | – |
|---|
| Frank Newman | 5,000 | 2,500 | – | – |
|---|
| Lady Patten of Wincanton | 12,370 | 8,370 | – | – |
|---|
| John Peace | 245,109 | 96,370 | 16,000 | 16,000 |
|---|
| Sir Alan Rudge | 8,950 | 6,450 | – | – |
|---|
| Alan Smart | – | – | – | – |
|---|
| Craig Smith | 42,001 | – | – | – |
|---|
| Oliver Stocken | 27,022 | 22,231 | – | – |
|---|
| David Tyler | 153,466 | 52,882 | 16,000 | 16,000 |
|---|
| (ii) Non-beneficial holdings | | | | |
|---|
| Sir Victor Blank | 3,000 | 3,000 | – | – |
|---|
| Lord Harris of Peckham | 25,000 | 25,000 | – | – |
|---|
On behalf of the Board
Lady Patten of Wincanton
Chairman – Remuneration Committee
24 May 2004
|